During President Trump's first term, the Pentagon opposed his desire for a military parade in Washington, aiming to keep the armed forces out of politics. In contrast, during his second term, plans for a parade have emerged, scheduled for the president's 79th birthday.
The event is set to feature a significant military display in Washington, including 28 M1A1 Abrams tanks, 28 Stryker armored personnel carriers, over 100 additional vehicles, a World War II B-25 bomber, 6,700 soldiers, 50 helicopters, 34 horses, two mules, and a dog.
Critics argue that this event exemplifies how the Trump administration has politicized the military. The Army estimates the cost of the parade to be between $25 million and $45 million, a notable amount given the ongoing discussions about cuts to education, health, and public assistance funding. The Army spokesperson acknowledged the expense, but emphasized its significance compared to 250 years of military service.
The Army is distinguishing the event as its birthday parade, marking the 250th anniversary of the Continental Army's formation on June 14, 1775, which coincidentally falls on Trump’s birthday.
Historically, there was no major celebration during the Army's 200th anniversary in 1975 due to Vietnam War sensitivities. Senator Jack Reed expressed that Fort Myer could have been a more subdued location for the event, reflecting a more traditional military celebration.
The parade will take place in front of Trump's viewing area near the White House on Constitution Avenue, and plans include marching troops, some dressed in historical military uniforms. The Army has spent over two years finalizing various celebration aspects, including sending an astronaut to commemorate the occasion.
While there are no current plans for a birthday song during the event, paratroopers from the Golden Knights are expected to land and present a flag to Trump. The Pentagon previously denied Trump's requests for a military parade during his first term, citing concerns about militarizing politics.
Now, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and more compliant military leadership, there are ongoing conversations regarding military displays at home. Some experts question whether this alignment signals a shift towards a politicized military identity.
Historical military parades typically follow significant conflicts; the last major U.S. military parade took place nearly 35 years ago to commemorate the end of the first Gulf War.
While some experts advocate for the parade as a chance to foster public connection with the military, others caution against its implications for military independence and tradition. Ultimately, the military appears prepared to follow the current administration's lead, raising questions about the longer-term consequences of such actions.