<div><img src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2026/07/30/multimedia/30dc-cornyn-tpjw/30dc-cornyn-tpjw-facebookJumbo.jpg" class="ff-og-image-inserted"></img></div>
<p>Senator John Cornyn, after losing his bid for re-election, signaled that his remaining time in the Senate could be disruptive for President Trump, warning that lame-duck lawmakers have leverage to influence events and would use it if necessary.</p>
<p>By leveraging his Judiciary Committee vote, Cornyn complicated the confirmation of Trump’s attorney general nominee, Todd Blanche, as the Senate adjourned for the weekend, signaling a tactical move to press for changes.</p>
<p>Cornyn and Senator Thom Tillis indicated they would not advance Blanche’s nomination unless the Justice Department narrows an IRS immunity settlement that protects Trump and his family, insisting that any modifications be put in writing.</p>
<p>The approach stops short of opposing the deal entirely, aiming instead for written guarantees limiting the immunity to Trump, his two sons, and the Trump Organization, and restricting it to audits of past tax returns.</p>
<p>The stance marks a notable shift for Cornyn, who had long been a loyal Trump ally, and it reflects a broader pattern of Republican lawmakers voicing concerns only when facing political consequences as they approach departure from office.</p>
<p>Cornyn’s public emphasis on transparency and written protections aligns with similar concerns raised by other Republicans, including discussions about the scope of the IRS settlement and related plans developed by the Justice Department.</p>
<p>Support among some colleagues, including those not facing re-election, was expressed, with colleagues noting the importance of clarifying commitments and whether the nominee can meet those terms if confirmed.</p>
<p>Key members, such as Senator Lisa Murkowski, indicated they had discussed similar issues privately and supported Cornyn’s efforts to seek written assurances, while others acknowledged the need for clarification to ensure understanding of Blanche’s testimony and the expected scope of the immunity arrangement.</p>
<p>Additional reporting contributors were acknowledged, and related materials were referenced in coverage. Adblock note: ad testing link included.</p>
<br><br><br><br>