The court’s six conservative justices showed nuanced differences in their interpretations of executive power as they rejected President Trump’s proposed tariffs.
The panel of justices divided on how much authority the executive branch has to impose tariffs, signaling varied legal perspectives within a conservative majority.
The decision reflects ongoing debate over the balance between executive actions and statutory constraints in trade policy, with the justices applying different rationales to reach a common outcome against the tariffs.
The ruling underscores a cautious stance toward broad presidential power in economic measures, while highlighting individual judicial philosophies among the conservative majority.