Considered authoritarian and corrupt, the Palestinian Authority is still Washington’s choice to run the enclave. But many believe it can be credible now only if it includes Hamas.
Headline: Palestinian Authority's Credibility Hinges on Inclusion of Hamas, Despite Authoritarian Reputation Subheading: Washington's Continued Support for the Palestinian Authority Raises Questions Amid Calls for Hamas Inclusion Analysis: The Palestinian Authority (PA), long criticized for its authoritarian practices and corruption, remains the preferred choice of the United States to govern the enclave. However, a growing number of voices argue that the PA can only regain credibility if it incorporates Hamas, the militant group currently excluded from the political process. Summary: Despite concerns over its authoritarian and corrupt nature, the Palestinian Authority is still favored by Washington to govern the enclave. However, there is a growing belief that the PA's credibility can only be restored if it includes Hamas, a demand that challenges the current exclusion of the militant group from the political landscape.
-
The article questions whether the Palestinian Authority is capable of governing Gaza after the war. Despite being seen as authoritarian and corrupt, it is still favored by Washington. However, some believe it can only be credible if it includes Hamas.
AI Powered News by Lil Newsy